![]() | Home | | | Message Boards | | | Audio | | Contact Us |
Introduction Why should we study literature?Because it points toward truth, and because it helps us understand how to express certain truths in the medium of words.The words themselves, in literature, are chosen with great care toward making a certain effect on the imagination. They show us something whole and entire: a story with a beginning, middle, and end, or a vision for us to contemplate. In so far as a story, poem, or play is true, it is
literature and the deeper the truth it gets at, the more Catholic it is.In other words, the more deeply the author
pursues truth, the more likely he is to find his way to the mysteries and
dogmas of the Church.This is what the
Welsh author Arthur Machen, a master of fantastic literature, had in mind when
he said: "Literature is the expression, through the
artistic medium of words, of the dogmas of the Catholic Church, and that which
is in any way out of harmony with these dogmas is not literature," for
"Catholic dogma is merely the witness, under a special symbolism, of the
enduring facts of human nature and the universe."Arthur Machen, Hieroglyphics: Notes on the
Ecstatic in Literature (1908) Therefore literature must be in harmony with reason
and natural law, at the least, and further it is expected to express some
universal truth such as the redemptive value of suffering, or the vanity of
human desire. To the extent that a writer
tries to have it both ways to arouse compassion for those who suffer, for
example, but depicting suffering itself as evil he is hedging his bets, and his
literary work will be inferior. In saying this, I'm going against my training in
modern literary criticism; two years toward a Master of Arts, and nine years
toward a Doctor of Philosophy. In
becoming a Doctor of Philosophy, I found that modern critics have been busy for
the past twenty years deconstructing universal truth, with disastrous consequences
for the teaching of literature. This is
probably the fundamental reason I'm no longer in the business. I'm also stating right here that literature
expresses ideas. Meaning cannot be
denied. When a modern poet says, as
does Archibald MacLeish, that a poem should not mean, but be, he is asking the
impossible of language. Language does
have meaning, because words have meaning.
At the opposite extreme, I used to hear from my freshman students, in
their essays, that a poem can have an infinite number of meanings. Well, I'm sorry, it's not true. A poem can have a range of meanings, but
that range is always limited, and the meanings are interrelated. An infinite number of meanings is as useless
as no meaning at all. The denial of universal meaning is probably the most
pervasive evil that Catholic authors today, and Catholic teachers, have to
struggle against. Nowadays college
courses in literature tend to skew their reading lists, and their
presentations, to cater to the self-esteem of selected oppressed groups,
instead of teaching those classics of literature that became classics for a
reason: because there was universal truth in them. And if they do teach those classics, very often modern teachers
subvert their meanings to show that this supposed universal classic is really
promoting the modern agenda of a particular oppressed group. Another pervasive evil is the lack of Catholic
readers. Until about 1960, there were
Americans who were producing poetry, drama and fiction on explicitly Catholic
themes, and these writers were being reviewed in Catholic periodicals, a sign
that, at least back then, a Catholic audience was somewhere out there. Nowadays a Catholic author has to assume
that his audience is going to be overwhelmingly non-Catholic, and increasingly
ignorant of reason, natural law, and universal truth. Flannery O'Connor said that the reason she used violence and
shockingly grotesque images in her short stories was (I'm paraphrasing here)
that she had to hit her reader over the head to make him pay attention to
Catholic truth. And this was in the
1950s. Now that the modern world has
become equally violent and grotesque, there is definitely a harvest of readers
out there who want to escape it, or to be assured that their hope lies elsewhere
than in the world. If Catholic authors
can get their works to this audience, then there is hope for Catholic
literature. This book will be like a Literature 101 course, seen
through Catholic eyes. I chose these
literary works carefully for their emphasis on Catholic truth, and they were
written by Catholics---with one exception, that being T. S. Eliot, who was an
Anglo-Catholic. I included a range of
literary genres, and ranged widely over historical periods, drawing mainly on
literature written in the last century.
Also, I have confined the scope to literature written in English, to
simplify certain issues. Historical
background is essential, and so I have included a great deal of literary
history, mostly about England, and some about the United States. I begin with epic poetry, the most ancient literary
genre, using an example G. K. Chesterton's Ballad
of the White Horsethat was written in modern times. From epic we proceed to drama, probably the second
oldest genre, using T. S. Eliot's Murder
in the Cathedral. Choosing a
dramatic work for this course list was tricky, as I'll explain when we get to
the section on drama. It has a lot to
do with the subversive agenda of modernism, on the one hand, and on the other
with the peculiar fact that the greatest dramas in English were being produced
just when the Catholic Faith in England was being most cruelly suppressed. Murder in the
Cathedral,
which deals with the martyrdom of St. Thomas ŕ ‚ecket, will prepare us for
Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, which
revolve around a group of medieval pilgrims on their way to the Becket's shrine
at Canterbury. Our text here is the
last tale, The Parson's Tale, (in modern English) and selections from the
verse Prologue. These are available in
excellent modern translations, although I would encourage you to take a look at
the language they were written in, which is called Middle English, and dates
from about 1066 to about 1500. The
Parson's Tale, by the way, was written in prose, and is almost never taught in
college Chaucer courses for reasons that will become clear when we read
it. Yet if the college instructor does
not deal with The Parson's Tale, the philosophical impact of the whole is
lost. Back in medieval times, when England was Catholic,
the Church actively promoted all the arts.
Drama in particular was a catechetical tool, and during penitential
seasons the Church presented dramas depicting the mysteries of the faith, and
the consequences of sin. These are
broadly termed mystery and morality plays.
The Second Shepherds' Play, which is funny as well as instructive, was
written by a priest in Wakefield, Yorkshire.
Everyman is a somber allegory dealing with the Four Last Things. Following drama, we'll read some
Counter-Reformation, baroque Nativity poems, written by Catholics during that
period of persecution. These are The
Burning Babe, and In the Holy Nativity of Our Lord God. A well-known lyric poem from the Victorian
period (1800s, or nineteenth century), Francis Thompson's The Hound of
Heaven, was very popular in the U. S. A. at the turn of the last century. We'll end with modern fiction. Two novelsBrideshead Revisited by Evelyn Waugh, and Wise Blood by Flannery O'Connor, broken up by a shorter work, J. R.
R. Tolkien's delightful allegory Leaf by Niggle. This is a Catholic allegory, which will afford us a chance to
look back at the medieval allegory Everyman
and discuss allegory in general. By the way, Brideshead
Revisited is a novel for more mature readers. It treats themes of homosexuality, drunkenness, and adultery in
an orthodox manner, but if you have doubts about this subject matter, perhaps
it may help you to read the chapter in this book before reading the novel
itself. Parents, too, are encouraged to
read this chapter. Brideshead and O'Connor's Wise Blood are both about conversion,
and the victory of God's grace over modern evils. Wise Blood is brutally
funny in its depiction of the absurd and grotesque condition of modern America. |